So, you can all exhale that breath you were holding in antipication of my first proper blog entry on the CAF: Malawi v Algeria
So, with no research done (this is my blog, look in the real papers for proper research), what do we know about the respective teams?
Malawi:
- it is in east africa
- I heard tell that it is amoungst the poorest of african countries
- they have several lakes
- A family friend and their family once moved to Malawi, for what reason i have no idea.
- They are not amoung the contenders for the tournament
Algeria:
- in England’s group for the world cup
- site of one bloody war of independence and one civil war
- previously home to the pieds noirs
- home to two of France’s more famous footballers, Zidane and Camus (one a philosophising footballer and the other a footballing philosopher
Teams:
One largely unrecognisable and the other completely so. The former, Algeria, lined up in a 4-4-2 diamond, with a smattering of names from the premiership and the SPL (and some recognised from Championship Manager; Ziani take a bow). Malawi lioned up in a 3-5-2, though during the game the holding midfielder dropped back into defence as an auxiliary centre back.
The game itself, or at least the first half and a wee bit of the second was pretty good. Lots of endeavour, good passing and defending, although lacking in great skill. Malawi generally sat back, happy to hit algeria on the break. That kind of a game plan requires good, stout defending, which the Malawians accomplished comfortably, aided greatly by a lack of endeavour or incisiveness on the part of the Algerians.
Malawi spread it wide well, and their relative domination of the midfield was rewaered within 20 minutes when a long ball over the top prompted the Algerian ‘keeper to rush out and belt the ball off the in-rushing attacker, the ball riccoching to a waiting Malawi striker who thumped home. An upset even bigger than that which al,ost came about was definately on the cards.
Algeria had a great chance to equalise ten minutes later, when a great ball was dinked over the Malawi defence into the box. Whoever was on the end of it (i haven’t gone to the trouble of matching names to numbers or faces) tried to lob the ‘keeper, but the ball ended up on top of the goal. A missed opportunity and malawi made them pay soon after. A free kick whipped in and converted to make it 2-0. It all seemed very simple. They got an unexpected third within minutes of the start of the second half. Anotyher ball into the box from the wing undealt with, a shot rasped off the post and not cleared, and Banda on hand to slot it into the net.
In all honesty, I knid of tuned out after that, with dinner on my mind. The second half continued rather uneventfully, bar a penalty shout by Algeria turned down by the ref. Was it? Wasn’t it? Who knows. A well-deserved win for Malawi, and the Algerians left with plenty to mull over. All told, a goal-packed first two days to the competition, even of the quality of the football does not always match the excitement
What have we learned today?
- The pace of the game was quite slow. Several reasons may explain this: the fact the game was on in the afternoon; the approach of Malawi and their happiness in sitting back.
- The amount of space on the pitch. While Malawi did push and harrass, particularly in their half, Algeria did not really press that hard when not in possession, leaving plenty of space for Malawi to use.
- The stadium was virtually empty. White elephants anyone?
I missed the other game today, chose to go to the shops instead. Ended Cote d’Ivoire 0-0 Burkino Faso. Not a great start by the African “galacticos”, but obviously it is difficult to surmise a match I didn’t actually watch. But, for me, 0-0 says enough.
Interesting Angola fact 2: Agriculture represents 9.2% of Angola’s GDP









